Paper detail

The impact of realistic axonal shape on axon diameter estimation using diffusion MRI

To study axonal microstructure with diffusion MRI, axons are typically modeled as straight impermeable cylinders, whereby the transverse diffusion MRI signal can be made sensitive to the cylinder's inner diameter. However, the shape of a real axon varies along the axon direction, which couples the longitudinal and transverse diffusion of the overall axon direction. Here we develop a theory of the intra-axonal diffusion MRI signal based on coarse-graining of the axonal shape by 3d diffusion. We demonstrate how the estimate of the inner diameter is confounded by the diameter variations (beading), and by the local variations in direction (undulations) along the axon. We analytically relate diffusion MRI metrics, such as time-dependent radial diffusivity D(t) and kurtosis K(t), to the axonal shape, and validate our theory using Monte Carlo simulations in synthetic undulating axons with randomly positioned beads, and in realistic axons reconstructed from electron microscopy images of mouse brain white matter. We show that (i) In the narrow pulse limit, the inner diameter from D(t) is overestimated by about twofold due to a combination of axon caliber variations and undulations (each contributing a comparable effect size); (ii) The narrow-pulse kurtosis K$_{t\to\infty}$ deviates from that in an ideal cylinder due to caliber variations; we also numerically calculate the fourth-order cumulant for an ideal cylinder in the wide pulse limit, which is relevant for inner diameter overestimation; (iii) In the wide pulse limit, the axon diameter overestimation is mainly due to undulations at low diffusion weightings b; and (iv) The effect of undulations can be considerably reduced by directional averaging of high-b signals, with the apparent inner diameter given by a combination of the axon caliber (dominated by the thickest axons), caliber variations, and the residual contribution of undulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.