Paper detail

The impact of quenching on galaxy profiles in the Simba simulation

We study specific star formation rate (sSFR) and gas profiles of star forming and green valley galaxies in the Simba cosmological hydrodynamic simulation. Star-forming galaxy half-light radii ($R_{\rm half}$) at $z=0$ and their evolution ($\propto(1+z)^{-0.78}$) agree with observations. Passive galaxy $R_{\rm half}$ agree with observations at high redshift, but by $z=0$ are too large, owing to numerical heating. We compare Simba $z=0$ sSFR radial profiles for star forming and green valley galaxies to observations. Simba shows strong central depressions in star formation rate (SFR), sSFR, and gas fraction in green valley galaxies and massive star-forming systems, qualitatively as observed, owing to black hole X-ray feedback, which pushes central gas outwards. Turning off X-ray feedback leads to centrally peaked sSFR profiles as in other simulations. In conflict with observations, Simba yields green valley galaxies with strongly dropping sSFR profiles beyond $\gtrsim R_{\rm half}$, regardless of AGN feedback. The central depression owes to lowering molecular gas content; the drop in the outskirts owes to reduced star formation efficiency. Simba's satellites have higher central sSFR and lower outskirts sSFR than centrals, in qualitative agreement with observations. At $z=2$ Simba does not show central depressions in massive star-forming galaxies, suggesting Simba's X-ray feedback should be more active at high-$z$. High resolution tests indicate central sSFR suppression is not sensitive to numerical resolution. Reproducing the central sSFR depression in $z=0$ green valley galaxies represents a unique success of Simba. The remaining discrepancies highlight the importance of SFR and gas profiles in constraining quenching mechanisms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.