Paper detail

The impact of outgassing of CO2 and prior calcium precipitation to the isotope composition of calcite precipitated on stalagmites. Implications for reconstructing climate information from proxies

Degassing of CO2 and precipitation of calcite to the surface of stalagmites can strongly impact isotope signals imprinted into the calcite of these speleothems. Here, we show that in all the variety of conditions occurring in nature only two distinct types of degassing exist. First, when a thin film of calcareous solution comes in contact to cave air lower pCO2 value than that of the aqueous CO2 in the water, molecular CO2 escapes by physical diffusion in several seconds. In a next step lasting several ten seconds, pH and DIC in the solution achieve chemical equilibrium with respect to the CO2 in the cave atmosphere. This solution becomes supersaturated with respect to calcite. During precipitation for each unit CaCO3 deposited one molecule of CO2 is generated and escapes from the solution. This precipitation driven degassing is active during precipitation only. We show that all variations of out gassing proposed in the literature are either diffusive outgassing or precipitation driven degassing and that diffusive outgassing has no influence on the isotope composition of the HCO3 - pool and consequently on that of calcite. Its isotope imprint is determined solely by precipitation driven degassing in contrast to most explanations in the literature. We present a theoretical model of d13C and d18O that explains the contributions of various parameters such as changes in temperature, changes of pCO2 in the cave atmosphere, and changes in the drip intervals to the isotope composition of calcite precipitated to the apex of the stalagmite. We use this model to calculate quantitatively changes of d13C and d18O observed in field experiments (Carlson et al., 2020) in agreement to their experimental data. We also apply our model to prior calcite precipitation (PCP) in the field as reported by Mickler et al. (2019). We discuss how PCP influences isotope composition signals. ...

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.