Paper detail

The impact of nebular emission on the ages of z~6 galaxies

We examine the influence of nebular continuous and line emission in high redshift star forming galaxies on determinations of their age, formation redshift and other properties from SED fits. We include nebular emission consistently with the stellar emission in our SED fitting tool and analyse differentially a sample of 10 z~6 galaxies in the GOODS-S field studied earlier by Eyles et al. (2007). We find that the apparent Balmer/4000 Ang breaks observed in a number of z~6 galaxies detected at >~3.6 micron with IRAC/Spitzer can be mimicked by the presence of strong restframe optical emission lines, implying in particular younger ages than previously thought. Applying these models to the small sample of z~6 galaxies, we find that this effect may lead to a typical downward revision of their stellar ages by a factor ~3. In consequence their average formation redshift may drastically be reduced, and these objects may not have contributed to cosmic reionisation at z>6. Extinction and stellar mass estimates may also be somewhat modified, but to a lesser extent. Careful SED fits including nebular emission and treating properly uncertainties and degeneracies are necessary for more accurate determinations of the physical parameters of high-z galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.