Paper detail

The impact of isomers on a kilonova associated with neutron star mergers

We investigate the significance of isomers on a kilonova associated with neutron star mergers (NSMs) for the first time. We calculate the evolution of abundances and energy generation rates ($\dotε_{\rm nuc}$) of ejecta from NSMs, taking into account $β^-$ decay through isomers. We find that for ejecta with electron fraction ($Y_e$) of $0.2-0.3$, $\dotε_{\rm nuc}$ is appreciably changed from those without isomers, due to the large change in timing of $β^-$ decay through the isomeric states of ${}^{123, 125, 127} \rm Sn$ and ${}^{128} \rm Sb$. In particular, the effects of the isomers on $\dotε_{\rm nuc}$ are prominent for ejecta of $Y_e \sim 0.25$, which could emit a fraction of an early, blue component of a kilonova observed in GW170817. When the excitation from a ground state to its isomeric state is important, the isomers of ${}^{129} \rm Sb$ and ${}^{129, 131} \rm Te$ also cause additional and appreciable change in $\dotε_{\rm nuc}$. Furthermore, we demonstrate that larger amounts of lanthanide-free ejecta result in a better fit of an observed light curve of the kilonova in GW170817 if the isomers are taken into account.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.