Paper detail

The impact of dark energy perturbations on the growth index

We show that in clustering dark energy models the growth index of linear matter perturbations, $γ$, can be much lower than in $Λ$CDM or smooth quintessence models and present a strong variation with redshift. We find that the impact of dark energy perturbations on $γ$ is enhanced if the dark energy equation of state has a large and rapid decay at low redshift. We study four different models with these features and show that we may have $0.33<γ\left(z\right)<0.48$ at $0<z<3$. We also show that the constant $γ$ parametrization for the growth rate, $f=d\lnδ_{m}/d\ln a=Ω_{m}^γ$, is a few percent inaccurate for such models and that a redshift dependent parametrization for $γ$ can provide about four times more accurate fits for $f$. We discuss the robustness of the growth index to distinguish between General Relativity with clustering dark energy and modified gravity models, finding that some $f\left(R\right)$ and clustering dark energy models can present similar values for $γ$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.