Paper detail

The impact of cosmic-ray attenuation on the carbon cycle emission in molecular clouds

Observations of the emission of the carbon cycle species (C, C+ CO) are commonly used to diagnose gas properties in the interstellar medium but are significantly sensitive to the cosmic-ray ionization rate. The carbon-cycle chemistry is known to be quite sensitive to the cosmic-ray ionization rate, $ζ$, controlled by the flux of low-energy cosmic rays which get attenuated through molecular clouds. However, astrochemical models commonly assume a constant cosmic-ray ionization rate in the clouds. We investigate the effect of cosmic-ray attenuation on the emission of carbon cycle species from molecular clouds, in particular the [CII] 158 $μ$m, [CI] 609 $μ$m and CO (J = 1 - 0) 115.27 GHz lines. We use a post-processed chemical model of diffuse and dense simulated molecular clouds and quantify the variation in both column densities and velocity integrated line emission of the carbon cycle with different cosmic-ray ionization rate models. We find that the abundances and column densities of carbon cycle species is significantly impacted by the chosen cosmic-ray ionization rate model: no single constant ionization rate can reproduce the abundances modelled with an attenuated cosmic-ray model. Further, we show that constant ionization rate models fail to simultaneously reproduce the integrated emission of the lines we consider, and their deviations from a physically derived cosmic-ray attenuation model is too complex to be simply corrected. We demonstrate that the two clouds we model exhibit a similar average $A_{\rm V, eff}$ -- $n_{\rm H}$ relationship, resulting in an average relation between the cosmic-ray ionization rate and density $ζ(n_{\rm H})$. We conclude by providing a number of implementation recommendations for CRs in astrochemical models, but emphasize the necessity for column-dependent cosmic-ray ionization rate prescriptions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.