Paper detail

The impact of binary stars on the colors of high-redshift galaxies

Evolutionary population synthesis (EPS) models play an important role in many studies on the formation and evolution of galaxies. Most EPS models are still poorly calibrated for certain stellar evolution stages, especially for the treatment of binary stars, which are very different from single stars. We aim to present color-magnitude (C-M) and color-color (C-C) relations for passive model galaxies in the redshift z$\sim0.0-3.0$ and to study the effect of binary interactions on these relations for high-redshift passive galaxies. Assuming exponentially declining star formation rate, we used a set of theoretical galaxy templates obtained from Yunnan EPS models (with and without binary interactions) to present the C-M and C-C relations for passive galaxies via Monte Carlo simulation. In Yunnan EPS models with binary interactions, various processes are included, such as mass transfer, mass accretion, common-envelope evolution, collisions, supernova kicks, tidal evolution, and all angular momentum loss mechanisms. In these models, approximately 50 per cent of the stellar systems are binary systems with orbital periods less than 100\,yr. This fraction is a typical value for the Milky Way. We find that the inclusion of binary interactions in the model galaxies' spectra can dramatically alter the predicted C-M and C-C relations and their evolution with redshift. For $z\sim 0.0$ and $1.0$, the binary interactions have a minor effect on the C-M and C-C relations, but at $z\sim 2.0$ and $3.0$ the binary interactions have a major effect on the C-M and C-C relations. Especially for the redshift $z\sim 2.0$, the $g-$band magnitude becomes smaller by $1.5$\,mag, the $g-r$ color becomes bluer by $1.0$\,mag, and the $u-g$ color becomes redder by $1.0$\,mag when binary interactions are included.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.