Paper detail

The Impact of Auto-Refactoring Code Smells on the Resource Utilization of Cloud Software

Cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) have gained popularity due to their low cost and elasticity. However, like other software, SaaS applications suffer from code smells, which can drastically affect functionality and resource usage. Code smell is any design in the source code that indicates a deeper problem. The software community deploys automated refactoring to eliminate smells which can improve performance and also decrease the usage of critical resources. However, studies that analyze the impact of automatic refactoring smells in SaaS on resources such as CPU and memory have been conducted to a limited extent. Here, we aim to fill that gap and study the impact on resource usage of SaaS applications due to automatic refactoring of seven classic code smells: god class, feature envy, type checking, cyclic dependency, shotgun surgery, god method, and spaghetti code. We specified six real-life SaaS applications from Github called Zimbra, OneDataShare, GraphHopper, Hadoop, JENA, and JAMES which ran on Openstack cloud. Results show that refactoring smells by tools like JDeodrant and JSparrow have widely varying impacts on the CPU and memory consumption of the tested applications based on the type of smell refactored. We present the resource utilization impact of each smell and also discuss the potential reasons leading to that effect.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.