Paper detail

The Impact of Assuming Flatness in the Determination of Neutrino Properties from Cosmological Data

Cosmological data have provided new constraints on the number of neutrino species and the neutrino mass. However these constraints depend on assumptions related to the underlying cosmology. Since a correlation is expected between the number of effective neutrinos N_{eff}, the neutrino mass \sum m_ν, and the curvature of the universe Ω_k, it is useful to investigate the current constraints in the framework of a non-flat universe. In this paper we update the constraints on neutrino parameters by making use of the latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the ACT and SPT experiments and consider the possibility of a universe with non-zero curvature. We first place new constraints on N_{eff} and Ω_k, with N_{eff} = 4.03 +/- 0.45 and 10^3 Ω_k = -4.46 +/- 5.24. Thus, even when Ω_k is allowed to vary, N_{eff} = 3 is still disfavored with 95% confidence. We then investigate the correlation between neutrino mass and curvature that shifts the 95% upper limit of \sum m_ν< 0.45 eV to \sum m_ν< 0.95 eV. Thus, the impact of assuming flatness in neutrino cosmology is significant and an essential consideration with future experiments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.