Paper detail

The impact of anisotropy on ITER scenarios

We report on the impact of anisotropy to tokamak plasma configuration and stability. Our focus is on analysis of the impact of anisotropy on ITER pre-fusion power operation 5~MA, $B=1.8$~T ICRH scenarios. To model ITER scenarios remapping tools are developed to distinguish the impact of pressure anisotropy from the change in magnetic geometry caused by an anisotropy-modified current profile. The remappings iterate the anisotropy-modified current profile to produce the same $q$ profile with matched thermal energy. The analysis is a step toward equilibria that are kinetically self-consistent for a prescribed scenario. We find characteristic detachment of flux surfaces from pressure surfaces, and an outboard (inboard) shift of peak density for $T_{\parallel}>T_\perp$ ( $T_{\parallel}<T_\perp$). Differences in the poloidal current profile are evident, albeit not as pronounced as for the spherical tokamak. We find that the incompressional continuum is largely unchanged in the presence of anisotropy, and the mode structure of gap modes is largely unchanged. The compressional branch however exhibits significant differences in the continuum. We report on the implication of these modifications.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.