Paper detail

The impact of analytical outage modeling on expansion planning problems in the area of power systems

Expansion planning problems refer to the monetary and unit investment needed for energy production or storage. An inherent element in these problems is the element of stochasticity in various aspects, such as the generation output of the units, climate change or frequency and duration of grid outages. Especially for the latter one, outage modeling is crucial to be carefully considered when designing systems with distributed generation at their core, such as microgrids. In most studies so far, a single statistical distribution is used, such as a Poisson Process. However, by taking a closer look at the real outage data provided by the state of NY, it is observed that the outages do not seem to come from the same distribution. In some years, there is a huge spike in the average duration per outage and this is because of catastrophic events. Therefore, in this study we propose and test an alternative modeling for outage events. This alternative scheme will be based on the premise that outages can be broadly classified into two categories: regular and severe. Under this taxonomy, it can still be assumed that each type of events follows a Poisson Process but outages, in general, follow a Poisson Process which is truly a superposition of these two types. A reinforcement learning approach is used to solve the expansion planning problem and real location-specific data are used. The results verify our initial hypothesis and show that the optimization results are significantly affected by the outage modeling. To sum up, modeling accurately the grid outage events and measuring directly the reliability performance of an energy system during catastrophic failures could provide invaluable tools and insights that could therefore be used for the best possible preparation for this type of outages.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.