Paper detail

The impact of a fossil magnetic field on dipolar mixed-mode frequencies in sub- and red-giant stars

Stars more massive than $\sim 1.3$ M$_\odot$ are known to develop a convective core during the main-sequence: the dynamo process triggered by this convection could be the origin of a strong magnetic field inside the core of the star, trapped when it becomes stably stratified and for the rest of its evolution. The presence of highly magnetized white dwarfs strengthens the hypothesis of buried fossil magnetic fields inside the core of evolved low-mass stars. If such a fossil field exists, it should affect the mixed modes of red giants as they are sensitive to processes affecting the deepest layers of these stars. The impact of a magnetic field on dipolar oscillations modes was one of Pr. Michael J. Thompson's research topics during the 90s when preparing the helioseismic SoHO space mission. As the detection of gravity modes in the Sun is still controversial, the investigation of the solar oscillation modes did not provide any hint of the existence of a magnetic field in the solar radiative core. Today we have access to the core of evolved stars thanks to the asteroseismic observation of mixed modes from CoRoT, Kepler, K2 and TESS missions. The idea of applying and generalizing the work done for the Sun came from discussions with Pr. Michael Thompson in early 2018 before we loss him. Following the path we drew together, we theoretically investigate the effect of a stable axisymmetric mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic field, aligned with the rotation axis of the star, on the mixed modes frequencies of a typical evolved low-mass star. This enables us to estimate the magnetic perturbations to the eigenfrequencies of mixed dipolar modes, depending on the magnetic field strength and the evolutionary state of the star. We conclude that strong magnetic fields of $\sim$ 1MG should perturbe the mixed-mode frequency pattern enough for its effects to be detectable inside current asteroseismic data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.