Paper detail

The impact and interplay of long and short branches on phylogenetic information content

In molecular systematics, evolutionary trees are reconstructed from sequences at the tips under simple models of site substitution. A central question is how much sequence data is required to reconstruct a tree accurately? The answer depends on the lengths of the branches (edges) of the tree, with very short and very long edges requiring long sequences for accurate tree inference, particularly when these branch lengths are arranged in certain ways. For four-taxon trees, the sequence length question was settled for the case of a rapid speciation event in the distant past. Here, we generalize this result and show that the same sequence length requirement holds even when the speciation event is recent, provided that at least one of the four taxa is distantly related to the others. However, this equivalence disappears if a molecular clock applies, since the length of the long outgroup edge becomes largely irrelevant in the estimation of the tree topology for a recent (but not a deep) divergence. We also show how our results can be extended to models in which substitution rates vary across sites, and to settings where more than four taxa are involved.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.