Paper detail

The hypothesis of the dust origin of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei

Strong broad emission lines are the most important signatures of active galactic nuclei. These lines allowed to discover the cosmological nature of quasars, and at present these lines allow for convenient method of weighting the black holes residing in their nuclei. However, a question remains why such strong lines form there in the first place. Specifically, in the case of Low Ionization Lines, there must be a mechanism which leads to an efficient rise of the material from the surface of the accretion disk surrounding a black hole but at the same time should not give a strong signature of the systematic outflow, as the Balmer lines are not significantly shifted with respect to the Narrow Line Region. We determine the effective temperature of the accretion disk underlying the H$β$ line at the basis of the time delay measured from reverberation and the simple Shakura-Sunyaev theory of accretion disks. We obtain that this temperature is universal, and equal $995 \pm 74$ K, independently from the black hole mass and accretion rate of the source. This result suggests to us that the dust formation in the disk atmosphere is responsible for the strong rise of the material. However, as the material gains height above the disk it becomes irradiated, the dust evaporates, the radiation pressure force suddently drops and the material fall back again at the disk. Therefore, a failed wind forms. In the simple version of the model the disk irradiation is neglected, but in the present paper we also discuss this irradiation and we use the observed variation of the Broad Line Region in NGC 5548 to constrain the character of this non-local non-stationary phenomenon. The current instruments cannot resolve the Broad Line Region but future instrumentation may allow to test the model directly.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.