Paper detail

The Hyperplane is the Only Stable, Smooth Solution to the Isoperimetric Problem in Gaussian Space

We study stable smooth solutions to the isoperimetric type problem for a Gaussian weight on Euclidean Space. That is, we study hypersurfaces $Σ^n \subset \mathbb R^{n+1}$ that are second order stable critical points of compact variations that minimize Gaussian weighted area and preserve Gaussian weighted volume. We show that such $Σ$ satisfy a curvature condition, and derive the Jacobi operator $L$ for the second variation of such $Σ$. Our first main result is that for non-planar $Σ$, bounds on the index of $L$, acting on volume preserving variations, gives us that $Σ$ splits off a linear space. A corollary of this result is that hyperplanes are the only stable smooth complete solutions to this Gaussian isoperimetric type problem, and that there are no hypersurfaces of index one. Finally, we show that for the case of $Σ^2 \subset \mathbb R^3$, there is a gradient decay estimate depending on bounds for the curvature condition and an appropriate area growth bound. This shows that, in the limit as $R \to \infty$, stable $(Σ, \partialΣ) \subset (B_{2R}(0), \partial B_{2R}(0))$ with good area growth bounds approach hyperplanes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.