Paper detail

The hyperbola rectification from Maclaurin to Landen and the Lagrange-Legendre transformation for the elliptic integrals

This article describes the main mathematical researches performed, in England and in the Continent between 1742-1827, on the subject of hyperbola rectification, thereby adding some of our contributions. We start with the Maclaurin inventions on Calculus and their remarkable role in the early mid 1700s; next we focus a bit on his evaluation, 1742, of the hyperbolic excess, explaining the true motivation behind his research. To his geometrical-analytical treatment we attach ours, a purely analytical alternative. Our hyperbola inquiry is then switched to John Landen, an amateur mathematician, who probably was writing more to fix his priorities than to explain his remarkable findings. We follow him in the obscure proofs of his theorem on hyperbola rectification, explaining the links to Maclaurin and so on. With a chain of geometrical constructions, we attach our interpretation to Landen's treatment. Our modern analytical proof to his hyperbolic limit excess, by means of elliptic integrals of the first and second kind is also provided, and we demonstrate why the so called Landen transformation for the elliptic integrals cannot be ascribed to him. Next, the subject leaves England for the Continent: the character of Lagrange is introduced, even if our interest concerns only his 1785 memoir on irrational integrals, where the Arithmetic Geometric Mean, AGM, is established by him. Nevertheless, our objective is not the AGM, but to detect the real source of the so-called Landen transformation for elliptic integrals. In fact, Lagrange's paper encloses a differential identity stemming from the AGM: integrating it, we show how it could be possible to arrive at the well-known Legendre recursive computation of a first kind elliptic integral, which appeared in his Traité, 1827, much after the Lagrange's paper.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.