Paper detail

The hydrogen Balmer lines and jump in absorption in accretion disc modeling -- an ultraviolet-optical spectral analysis of the dwarf novae UZ Serpentis and CY Lyrae

The spectra of disc-dominated cataclysmic variables (CVs) often deviate from the spectra of accretion disc models; in particular, the Balmer jump and absorption lines are found to be shallower in the observations than in the models. We carried out a combined ultraviolet-optical spectral analysis of two dwarf novae: UZ Ser in outburst, decline, and quiescence, and CY Lyr on the rise to outburst and in outburst. We fit the Balmer jump and absorption lines, the continuum flux level and slope by adjusting the accretion rate, inclination, and disc outer radius. For both systems we find an accretion rate $\dot{M} \approx 8 \times 10^{-9}M_\odot$/yr in outburst, and $\dot{M} \approx 2-3 \times 10^{-9}M_\odot$/yr for the rise and decline phases. The outer disc radius we derive is smaller than expected ($R_{\rm disc} \approx 0.2a$, where $a$ is the binary separation), except during late rise (for CY Lyr) where $R_{\rm disc}=0.3a$. UZ Ser also reveals a 60,000~K white dwarf. These results show that during a dwarf nova cycle the radius of the disc is the largest just before the peak of the outburst, in qualitative agreement with the disc instability model for dwarf nova outbursts. We suspect that an additional emitting component (e.g. disc wind) is also at work to reduce the slope of the continuum and size of the Balmer jump and absorption lines. We stress that both the outer disc radius and disc wind need to be taken into account for more realistic disc modeling of CVs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.