Paper detail

The Hubble Tension Revisited: Additional Local Distance Ladder Uncertainties

In a recent paper, we investigated possible systematic uncertainties related to the Cepheid color-luminosity calibration method and their influence on the tension between the Hubble constant as inferred from distances to Type Ia supernovae and the cosmic microwave background as measured with the Planck satellite. Here, we study the impact of other sources of uncertainty in the supernova distance ladder, including Cepheid temperature and metallicity variations, supernova magnitudes and GAIA parallax distances. Using Cepheid data in 19 Type Ia supernova host galaxies from Riess et al (2016), anchor data from Riess et al (2016, 2019, 2021) and a set of re-calibrated Milky Way Cepheid distances, we obtain $H_0 = 71.9\pm 2.2$ km/s/Mpc, $2.0\,σ$ from the Planck value. Excluding Cepheids with estimated color excesses $\hat{E}({\rm V} - {\rm I})=0.15$ mag to mitigate the impact of the Cepheid color-luminosity calibration, the inferred Hubble constant is $H_0 = 68.1\pm 2.6$ km/s/Mpc, removing the tension with the Planck value.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.