Paper detail

The HR 1614 moving group is not a dissolving cluster

The HR 1614 overdensity in velocity space and has for a long time been known as an old (~2 Gyr) and metal-rich ([Fe/H]~0.2) nearby moving group that has a dissolving cluster origin. The existence of such old and metal-rich groups in the solar vicinity is quite unexpected since the vast majority of nearby moving groups are known to be young. In the light of new and significantly larger data sets we aim to re-investigate the properties and origin of the HR 1614 moving group. To identify and characterise the HR 1614 moving group we use astrometric data from Gaia DR2; distances, extinction, and reddening corrections from the StarHorse code; elemental abundances from the GALAH and APOGEE spectroscopic surveys; and photometric metallicities from the SkyMapper survey. Bayesian ages were estimated for the SkyMapper stars. Since the Hercules stream is the closest kinematical structure to the HR 1614 moving group in velocity space, we use it for comparison purposes. Stars that are likely to be members of the two groups were selected based on their space velocities. The HR 1614 moving group is located mainly at negative U velocities, does not form an arch of constant energy in the U-V space and is tilted in V. The overdensity is not chemically homogeneous but that its stars exist at a wide range of both metallicities, ages, and elemental abundance ratios. They are essentially similar to what is observed in the Galactic thin and thick disks, a younger population (~3 Gyr) that is metal-rich (-0.2<[Fe/H]<0.4) and alpha-poor. It should therefore not be considered as a dissolving open cluster, or an accreted population. We suggest that HR 1614 has a complex origin that could be explained by combining several different mechanisms such as resonances with the Galactic bar and spiral structure, phase-mixing of dissolving spiral structure, and phase-mixing due to an external perturbation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.