Paper detail

The Host in Blue Compact Galaxies: Structural Properties and Scaling Relations

We have characterized the underlying stellar host in a sample of 28 blue compact galaxies (BCGs), by fitting their 2D light distributions. Their structural parameters were related with galaxy properties such as colours and gas content. These properties were also compared with those of other galaxy types. All the BCG hosts but one show low Sersic indexes (0.5 < n < 2), with mean effective radius <$r_{e,B}$>=1.11$\pm$0.74 kpc, and mean surface brightness <$μ_{e,B}$> = 22.59$\pm$0.68 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. Host effective radii scale linearly with their luminosity, while n and $μ_{\rm e}$ do not. In addition, host colours and structural parameters are not linearly correlated. Overall,the flux enhancement caused by the starburst is about 0.8 mag while their B-R colours decrease by about 0.2 mag. Galaxies with more luminous and extended hosts show larger and luminous starburst components. BCG hosts show B-R=0.95$\pm$0.26 in median. Overall, BCG hosts are more compact (by a factor ~2) and have higher central surface brightnesses (by about ~2 mag) than dIs and most dEs. BCG hosts and dIs are indistinguishable in the B-band Tully-Fisher relation (TFR). We found that about 50-60 % of the galaxies are more underluminous than those late-type discs with the same circular velocity. This feature is more important when luminosities are converted into stellar masses, while it tends to diminish when the HI gas mass is added. Deviations among host masses for a given circular velocity from the stellar TFR correlate with their HI mass-to-luminosity ratio, whereas deviations from the gas+stellar TFR, do not. Overall, our findings suggest that the baryonic mass in BCGs tends to normal values but BCGs tend to be inefficient producing stars, especially toward the low-mass, gas-rich and bluest hosts, in a similar way to dIs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.