Paper detail

The homotopy type of spaces of resultants of bounded multiplicity

For positive integers $m,n, d\geq 1$ with $(m,n)\not= (1,1)$ and a field $\Bbb F$ with its algebraic closure $\overline{\Bbb F}$, let $\text{Poly}^{d,m}_n(\Bbb F)$ denote the space of all $m$-tuples $(f_1(z),\cdots ,f_m(z))\in \Bbb F [z]$ of monic polynomials of the same degree $d$ such that polynomials $f_1(z),\cdots ,f_m(z)$ have no common root in $\overline{\Bbb F}$ of multiplicity $\geq n$. These spaces were defined by Farb and Wolfson in \cite{FW} as generalizations of spaces first studied by Arnold, Vassiliev, Segal and others in different contexts. In \cite{FW} they obtained algebraic geometrical and arithmetic results about the topology of these spaces. In this paper we investigate the homotopy type of these spaces for the case $\Bbb F =\mathbb{C}$. Our results generalize those of \cite{FW} for $\Bbb F =\Bbb C$ and also results of G. Segal \cite{Se}, V. Vassiliev \cite{Va} and F.Cohen-R.Cohen-B.Mann-R.Milgram \cite{CCMM} for $m\geq 2$ and $n\geq 2$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.