Paper detail

The homotopy theory of diffeological spaces

Diffeological spaces are generalizations of smooth manifolds. In this paper, we study the homotopy theory of diffeological spaces. We begin by proving basic properties of the smooth homotopy groups that we will need later. Then we introduce the smooth singular simplicial set $S^D(X)$ associated to a diffeological space $X$, and show that when $S^D(X)$ is fibrant, it captures smooth homotopical properties of $X$. Motivated by this, we define $X$ to be fibrant when $S^D(X)$ is, and more generally define cofibrations, fibrations and weak equivalences in the category of diffeological spaces using the smooth singular simplicial set functor. We conjecture that these form a model category structure, but in this paper we assume little prior knowledge of model categories, and instead focus on concrete questions about smooth manifolds and diffeological spaces. We prove that our setup generalizes the naive smooth homotopy theory of smooth manifolds by showing that a smooth manifold without boundary is fibrant and that for fibrant diffeological spaces, the weak equivalences can be detected using ordinary smooth homotopy groups. We also show that our definition of fibrations generalizes Iglesias-Zemmour's theory of diffeological bundles. We prove enough of the model category axioms to show that every diffeological space has a functorial cofibrant replacement. We give many explicit examples of objects that are cofibrant, not cofibrant, fibrant and not fibrant, as well as many other examples showing the richness of the theory. For example, we show that the free loop space of a smooth manifold is fibrant. One of the implicit points of this paper is that the language of model categories is an effective way to organize homotopical thinking, even when it is not known that all of the model category axioms are satisfied.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.