Paper detail

The Homogeneous Properties of Halpha-Selected Galaxies at (0.05<z<0.15)

We show that the Halpha line (6563 Angstrom) alone is an extremely effective criterion for identifying galaxies that are uniform in color (red), luminosity-weighted age (old), and morphology (bulge-dominated). By combining the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Data Release 6) with the New York University Value-Added Galaxy Catalog, we have photometric and spectroscopic indices for over 180,000 galaxies at (0.05<z<0.15). We separate the galaxies into three samples: 1) galaxies with Halpha equivalent width EW(Halpha)<0 Angstrom (i.e. no emission); 2) galaxies with morphological Sersic index n>2 (bulge-dominated); and 3) galaxies with n>2 that are also red in (g'-r'). We find that the Halpha-selected galaxies consistently have the smallest color scatter: for example, at z~0.05 the intrinsic scatter in apparent (g'-r') for the Halpha sample is only 0.0287+/-0.0007 compared to 0.0682+/-0.0014 for the Sersic sample. Applying a color-cut to the n>2 sample does decrease the color scatter to 0.0313+/-0.0007, but there remains a measurable fraction of star-forming and/or AGN galaxies (up to 9.3%). All of the EW(Halpha)<0 Angstrom galaxies have n>2, i.e. they are bulge-dominated systems. The spectra for the three samples confirm that the Halpha-selected galaxies have the highest D4000 values and are, on average, nearly twice as old as the Sersic-selected samples. With the advent of multi-object near-infrared spectrographs, Halpha alone can be used to reliably isolate truly quiescent galaxies dominated by evolved stellar populations at any epoch from z~0 up to z~2.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.