Paper detail

The homogeneity of the star forming environment of the Milky Way disk over time

Stellar abundances and ages afford the means to link chemical enrichment to galactic formation. In the Milky Way, individual element abundances show tight correlations with age, which vary in slope across ([Fe/H]-[$α$/Fe]). Here, we step from characterising abundances as measures of age, to understanding how abundances trace properties of stellar birth-environment in the disk over time. Using measurements from $\sim$27,000 APOGEE stars (R=22,500, SNR$>$200), we build simple local linear models to predict a sample of elements (X = Si, O, Ca, Ti, Ni, Al, Mn, Cr) using (Fe, Mg) abundances alone, as fiducial tracers of supernovae production channels. Given [Fe/H] and [Mg/H], we predict these elements, [X/H], to about double the uncertainty of their measurements. The intrinsic dispersion, after subtracting measurement errors in quadrature is $\approx 0.015-0.04$~dex. The residuals of the prediction (measurement $-$ model) for each element demonstrate that each element has an individual link to birth properties at fixed (Fe, Mg). Residuals from primarily massive-star supernovae (i.e. Si, O, Al) partially correlate with guiding radius. Residuals from primarily supernovae Ia (i.e. Mn, Ni) partially correlate with age. A fraction of the intrinsic scatter that persists at fixed (Fe, Mg), however, after accounting for correlations, does not appear to further discriminate between birth properties that can be traced with present-day measurements. Presumably, this is because the residuals are also, in part, a measure of the typical (in)-homogeneity of the disk's stellar birth environments, previously inferred only using open-cluster systems. Our study implies at fixed birth radius and time, there is a median scatter of $\approx 0.01-0.015$ dex in elements generated in supernovae sources.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.