Paper detail

The heterogeneous near-surface velocity structure of a carbonate-hosted seismogenic fault zone and its dependence on the investigated length scale

Field geological studies highlighted the heterogeneous structure of fault zones from the meter- to millimeter scale, but such internal variability is not generally resolved by seismological techniques due to spatial resolution limits. The near-surface velocity structure of the Vado di Corno seismogenic fault zone was quantified at different length scales, from laboratory measurements of ultrasonic velocities (few centimeters rock samples, 1 MHz source) to high-resolution first-arrival seismic tomography (spatial resolution to a few meters). The fault zone juxtaposed structural units with contrasting ultrasonic velocities. The fault core cataclastic units were slower compared to damage zone units. A negative correlation between ultrasonic velocity and porosity was observed, with dispersion in fault core units related to varying degree of textural maturity and pore space sealing by calcite. Low-velocity outliers in the damage zone were instead linked to microfracture networks with local cataclasis and partial calcite sealing. P-wave high-resolution seismic tomography imaged distinct fault-bounded rock bodies, matching the geometry and size of field-mapped structural units. At this length scale, relatively fast fault core units and low-strain damage zones contrasted with a very slow intensely fractured high-strain damage zone. The discrepancy between higher ultrasonic velocities and lower tomography-derived ones was reconciled through an effective medium approach considering the effect of meso-scale fractures in each unit. This revealed a heterogeneous fault zone velocity structure with different scaling among structural units. Lastly, the persistence of a thick compliant high-strain damage zone at shallow depth may significantly affect fault zone mechanics and the distribution of near-surface deformations.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.