Paper detail

The heavy top quark in the two Higgs doublet model

Constraints on the two Higgs doublet model are presented, assuming a top mass of 174 $\pm$ 17 GeV. We concentrate primarily on the ``type II'' model, where up--type quarks receive their mass from one Higgs doublet, and down--type quarks receive their mass from the second doublet. High energy constraints derived from the $W$ mass, the full width of the $Z$ and the $b \bar b$ partial width of the $Z$ are combined with low energy constraints from $Γ(b\to s γ)$, $Γ(b \to c τ\barν_τ)$ and $B^0$-$\bar B^0$ mixing to determine the experimentally favored configurations of the model. This combination of observables rules out small charged Higgs masses and small values of $\tanβ$, and provides some information about the neutral Higgs masses and the mixing angle $α$. In particular, constraints derived from the $ρ$ parameter rule out configurations where the charged Higgs is much heavier or much lighter than the neutral Higgses. We discuss a scenario where $Γ(Z\to b \bar b)$ is enhanced relative to the standard model result, which unfortunately is on the verge of being ruled out by the combination of $Γ(b\to s γ)$ and $ρ$ parameter constraints. Implications for various extensions of the standard model are briefly discussed.

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.