Paper detail

The Halo Occupation Distribution of SDSS Quasars

We present an estimate of the projected two-point correlation function (2PCF) of quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) over the full range of one- and two-halo scales, 0.02-120 Mpc/h. This was achieved by combining data from SDSS DR7 on large scales and Hennawi et al. (2006; with appropriate statistical corrections) on small scales. Our combined clustering sample is the largest spectroscopic quasar clustering sample to date, containing ~48,000 quasars in the redshift range 0.4<z<2.5 with median redshift 1.4. We interpret these precise 2PCF measurements within the halo occupation distribution (HOD) framework and constrain the occupation functions of central and satellite quasars in dark matter halos. In order to explain the small-scale clustering, the HOD modeling requires that a small fraction of z~1.4 quasars, fsat=(7.4+/-1.4) 10^(-4), be satellites in dark matter halos. At z~1.4, the median masses of the host halos of central and satellite quasars are constrained to be Mcen=(4.1+0.3/-0.4) 10^12 Msun/h and Msat=(3.6+0.8/-1.0) 10^14 Msun/h, respectively. To investigate the redshift evolution of the quasar-halo relationship, we also perform HOD modeling of the projected 2PCF measured by Shen et al. (2007) for SDSS quasars with median redshift 3.2. We find tentative evidence for an increase in the mass scale of quasar host halos---the inferred median mass of halos hosting central quasars at z~3.2 is Mcen=(14.1+5.8/-6.9) 10^12 Msun/h. The cutoff profiles of the mean occupation functions of central quasars reveal that quasar luminosity is more tightly correlated with halo mass at higher redshifts. The average quasar duty cycle around the median host halo mass is inferred to be fq=(7.3+0.6/-1.5) 10^(-4) at z~1.4 and fq=(8.6+20.4/-7.2) 10^(-2) at z~3.2. We discuss the implications of our results for quasar evolution and quasar-galaxy co-evolution.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.