Paper detail

The Halo Occupation Distribution and the Physics of Galaxy Formation

The halo occupation distribution (HOD) describes the bias between galaxies and dark matter by specifying (a) the probability P(N|M) that a halo of virial mass M contains N galaxies of a particular class and (b) the relative distributions of galaxies and dark matter within halos. We calculate predicted HODs for a Lambda-CDM cosmological model using an SPH hydrodynamic simulation and a semi-analytic (SA) galaxy formation model. Although the two methods predict different galaxy mass functions, their HOD predictions agree remarkably well. For mass-selected samples, the mean occupation <N(M)> exhibits a sharp cutoff at low halo masses, a slowly rising plateau for <N>~1-2, and a more steeply rising high occupancy regime. At low <N>, the mean pair and triple counts are well below Poisson expectations, with important consequences for small scale behavior of 2- and 3-point correlation functions. The HOD depends strongly on galaxy age, with high mass halos populated mainly by old galaxies and low mass halos by young galaxies. The SPH simulation supports several simplifying assumptions about HOD bias: the most massive galaxy in a halo usually lies close to the center and moves near the halo's mean velocity; satellite galaxies have the same radial profile and velocity dispersion as the dark matter; and the mean occupation at fixed halo mass is independent of the halo's larger scale environment. By applying the SPH and SA HODs to a large volume N-body simulation, we show that both methods predict slight, observable departures from a power-law galaxy correlation function. The predicted HODs are closely tied to the underlying galaxy formation physics, they offer useful guidance to theoretical models of galaxy clustering, and they will be tested empirically by ongoing analyses of galaxy redshift surveys. (Shortened)

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.