Paper detail

The halo masses and galaxy environments of hyperluminous QSOs at z~2.7 in the Keck Baryonic Structure Survey

We present an analysis of the galaxy distribution surrounding 15 of the most luminous (>10^{14} L_sun; M_1450 ~ -30) QSOs in the sky with z~2.7. Our data are drawn from the Keck Baryonic Structure Survey (KBSS). In this work, we use the positions and spectroscopic redshifts of 1558 galaxies that lie within ~3', (4.2 h^{-1} comoving Mpc; cMpc) of the hyperluminous QSO (HLQSO) sightline in one of 15 independent survey fields, together with new measurements of the HLQSO systemic redshifts. We measure the galaxy-HLQSO cross-correlation function, the galaxy-galaxy autocorrelation function, and the characteristic scale of galaxy overdensities surrounding the sites of exceedingly rare, extremely rapid, black hole accretion. On average, the HLQSOs lie within significant galaxy overdensities, characterized by a velocity dispersion sigma_v ~ 200 km s^{-1} and a transverse angular scale of ~25", (~200 physical kpc). We argue that such scales are expected for small groups with log(M_h/M_sun)~13. The galaxy-HLQSO cross-correlation function has a best-fit correlation length r_0_GQ = (7.3 \pm 1.3) h^{-1} cMpc, while the galaxy autocorrelation measured from the spectroscopic galaxy sample in the same fields has r_0_GG = (6.0 \pm 0.5) h^{-1} cMpc. Based on a comparison with simulations evaluated at z ~ 2.6, these values imply that a typical galaxy lives in a host halo with log(M_h/M_sun) = 11.9\pm0.1, while HLQSOs inhabit host halos of log(M_h/M_sun) = 12.3\pm0.5. In spite of the extremely large black hole masses implied by their observed luminosities [log(M_BH/M_sun) > 9.7], it appears that HLQSOs do not require environments very different from their much less luminous QSO counterparts. Evidently, the exceedingly low space density of HLQSOs (< 10^{-9} cMpc^{-3}) results from a one-in-a-million event on scales << 1 Mpc, and not from being hosted by rare dark matter halos.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.