Paper detail

The Hadronic Picture of the Radiogalaxy M87

Very high energy gamma-ray emission of Fanaroff-Riley I objects is not univocally explained by a single emission model. Leptonic models with one and multi-zone emission regions, occurring in the jet of these objects, are usually used to describe the broadband spectral energy distribution. A correlation between the X-ray and TeV emission is naturally expected within leptonic models whereas a lack of correlation between these two observables represents a challenge and favors the hadronic scenarios. This is the case of M87 as we show here by analyzing its TeV and X-ray emission recorded in the last decade. Furthermore, we point out that the spectra obtained by MAGIC, H.E.S.S. and VERITAS telescopes cannot be described with the same leptonic model introduced by the Fermi-LAT collaboration. We introduce hadronic scenarios to explain the TeV gamma-ray fluxes of this radiogalaxy as products of Fermi-accelarated protons interacting with seed photons in the jet or thermal particles in the giant lobes. By fitting this part of spectral energy distribution as pion decay products, we obtain the expected neutrino counterpart and the luminosity of accelerating protons in the jet and/or lobes. With the expected neutrino fluxes we investigate, through Monte Carlo simulations, the possibility to see the signal from M87 with a Km$^{3}$ neutrino telescope, and compare the results with what has been seen by IceCube experiment up to now. Finally we constrain the features of giant lobes through the observations performed at ultra high energies by TA experiment.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.