Paper detail

The GW-Universe Toolbox II: constraining the binary black hole population with second and third generation detectors

We employ the method used by the GW-Universe Toolbox to generate a synthetic catalogue of detection of stellar mass binary black hole (BBH) mergers. We study advanced LIGO (aLIGO) and Einstein Telescope (ET) as two representatives for the 2nd and 3rd generation GW observatories, and study how GW observations of BBHs can be used to constrain the merger rate as function of redshift and masses. We also simulate the observations from a detector that is half as sensitive as the ET at design which represents an early phase of ET. Two methods are used to obtain the constraints on the source population properties from the catalogues: 1. parametric differential merger rate model and applies a Bayesian inference on the parameters; and 2. non-parametric and uses weighted Kernel density estimators. The results show the overwhelming advantages of the 3rd generation detector over the 2nd generation for the study of BBH population properties, especially at a redshifts higher than ~2, where the merger rate is believed to peak. With the simulated aLIGO catalogue, the parametric Bayesian method can still give some constraints on the merger rate density and mass function beyond its detecting horizon, while the non-parametric method lose the constraining ability completely there. We also find that, despite the numbers of detection of the half-ET can be easily compatible with full ET after a longer observation duration, the catalogue from the full ET can still give much better constraints on the population properties, due to its smaller uncertainties on the physical parameters of the GW events.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.