Paper detail

The growth of supermassive black holes in pseudo-bulges, classical bulges and elliptical galaxies

Using results from structural analysis of a sample of nearly 1000 local galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we estimate how the mass in central black holes is distributed amongst elliptical galaxies, classical bulges and pseudo-bulges, and investigate the relation between their stellar masses and central stellar velocity dispersion sigma. Assuming a single relation between elliptical galaxy/bulge mass, M_Bulge, and central black hole mass, M_BH, we find that 55^{+8}_{-4} per cent of the mass in black holes in the local universe is in the centres of elliptical galaxies, 41^{+4}_{-2} per cent in classical bulges and 4^{+0.9}_{-0.4} per cent in pseudo-bulges. We find that ellipticals, classical bulges and pseudo-bulges follow different relations between their stellar masses and sigma, and the most significant offset occurs for pseudo-bulges in barred galaxies. This structural dissimilarity leads to discrepant black hole masses if single M_BH-M_Bulge and M_BH-sigma relations are used. Adopting relations from the literature, we find that the M_BH-sigma relation yields an estimate of the total mass density in black holes that is roughly 55 per cent larger than if the M_BH-M_Bulge relation is used.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.