Paper detail

The growth of matter perturbations in f(R) models

We consider the linear growth of matter perturbations on low redshifts in some $f(R)$ dark energy (DE) models. We discuss the definition of dark energy (DE) in these models and show the differences with scalar-tensor DE models. For the $f(R)$ model recently proposed by Starobinsky we show that the growth parameter $γ_0\equiv γ(z=0)$ takes the value $γ_0\simeq 0.4$ for $Ω_{m,0}=0.32$ and $γ_0\simeq 0.43$ for $Ω_{m,0}=0.23$, allowing for a clear distinction from $Λ$CDM. Though a scale-dependence appears in the growth of perturbations on higher redshifts, we find no dispersion for $γ(z)$ on low redshifts up to $z\sim 0.3$, $γ(z)$ is also quasi-linear in this interval. At redshift $z=0.5$, the dispersion is still small with $Δγ\simeq 0.01$. As for some scalar-tensor models, we find here too a large value for $γ'_0\equiv \frac{dγ}{dz}(z=0)$, $γ'_0\simeq -0.25$ for $Ω_{m,0}=0.32$ and $γ'_0\simeq -0.18$ for $Ω_{m,0}=0.23$. These values are largely outside the range found for DE models in General Relativity (GR). This clear signature provides a powerful constraint on these models.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.