Paper detail

The growth of H II regions around massive stars: the role of metallicity and dust

Gas metallicity $Z$ and the related dust-to-gas ratio $f_\textrm{d}$ can influence the growth of HII regions via metal line cooling and UV absorption. We model these effects in star-forming regions containing massive stars. We compute stellar feedback from photoionization and radiation pressure (RP) using Monte Carlo radiative transfer coupled with hydrodynamics, including stellar and diffuse radiation fields. We follow a $10^5$ M$_\odot$ turbulent cloud with $Z/$Z$_\odot$ = 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and $f_\textrm{d} = 0.01 Z/$Z$_\odot$ with a cluster-sink particle method for star formation. The models evolve for at least 1.5 Myr under feedback. Lower $Z$ results in higher temperatures and therefore larger HII regions. For $Z \ge$Z$_\odot$, radiation pressure $P_\textrm{rad}$ can dominate locally over the gas pressure $P_\textrm{gas}$ in the inner half-parsec around sink particles. Globally, the ratio of $P_\textrm{rad}/P_\textrm{gas}$ is around 1 (2 Z$_\odot$), 0.3 (Z$_\odot$), 0.1 (0.5 Z$_\odot$), and 0.03 (0.1 Z$_\odot$). In the solar model, excluding RP results in an ionized volume several times smaller than the fiducial model with both mechanisms. Excluding RP and UV attenuation by dust results in a larger ionized volume than the fiducial case. That is, UV absorption hinders growth more than RP helps it. The radial expansion velocity of ionized gas reaches $+$15 km/s outwards, while neutral gas has inward velocities for most of the runtime, except for 0.1 Z$_\odot$ which exceeds $+$4 km/s. $Z$ and $f_\textrm{d}$ do not significantly alter the star formation efficiency, rate, or cluster half-mass radius, with the exception of 0.1 Z$_\odot$ due to the earlier expulsion of neutral gas.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.