Paper detail

The growth factor parametrization versus numerical solutions in flat and non-flat dark energy models

In the present investigation we use observational data of $ f σ_ {8} $ to determine observational constraints in the plane $(Ω_{m0},σ_{8})$ using two different methods: the growth factor parametrization and the numerical solutions method for density contrast, $δ_{m}$. We verified the correspondence between both methods for three models of accelerated expansion: the $ΛCDM$ model, the $ w_{0}w_{a} CDM$ model and the running cosmological constant $RCC$ model. In all case we consider also curvature as free parameter. The study of this correspondence is important because the growth factor parametrization method is frequently used to discriminate between competitive models. Our results we allow us to determine that there is a good correspondence between the observational constrains using both methods. We also test the power of the $ fσ_ {8} $ data to constraints the curvature parameter within the $ ΛCDM $ model. For this we use a non-parametric reconstruction using Gaussian processes. Our results show that the $ fσ_ {8}$ data with the current precision level does not allow to distinguish between a flat and non-flat universe.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.