Paper detail

The Growth and Enrichment of the Intragroup Gas

The thermal and chemical properties of the hot diffuse intragroup medium (IGrM) provide important constraints on the feedback processes associated with massive galaxy formation and evolution. Here we explore these constraints via a detailed analysis of the global properties of simulated z<3 galaxy groups from a cosmological simulation that includes a well-constrained prescription for stellar/supernovae-powered galactic outflows but no AGN feedback. Our aims are to (a) establish a baseline against which we will compare future models; (b) identify model successes due to stellar/supernovae-powered outflows; and (c) pinpoint features that signal the need for, and constrain the nature of, AGN feedback. Our simulation successfully reproduces key observed z=0 group IGrM properties, including the various X-ray Lx - Tx - entropy scaling relations, for all but the most massive groups. The z<1 redshift evolution of these also agree with observations. Contrary to expectations, the simulated groups' IGrM does not suffer catastrophic cooling. Yet, the z=0 group stellar mass is ~ 2X too large. This is due to the build-up of cold gas in the massive galaxies before they are incorporated inside groups. This in turn indicates that other feedback mechanisms must activate in real galaxies once their stellar masses grow to a few X 10^{10} M_sun. We show that these must be powerful enough to expel a significant fraction of the gas from the galactic halos. Gentle maintenance-mode (quenching) AGN feedback, as seen in galaxy clusters, will not do. Just as importantly, we find that the stellar/supernovae-powered winds are essential for understanding the IGrM metal abundances. Our simulation is able to reproduce the observed relationship between the global IGrM iron and silicon abundance and the group X-ray temperature, and these results ought to be relatively insensitive to the addition of AGN feedback.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.