Paper detail

The Golod-Shafarevich inequality for Hilbert series of quadratic algebras and the Anick conjecture

We study the question on whether the famous Golod-Shafarevich estimate, which gives a lower bound for the Hilbert series of a (noncommutative) algebra, is attained. This question was considered by Anick in his 1983 paper 'Generic algebras and CW-complexes', Princeton Univ. Press., where he proved that the estimate is attained for the number of quadratic relations $d \leq \frac{n^2}{4}$ and $d \geq \frac{n^2}{2}$, and conjectured that this is the case for any number of quadratic relations. The particular point where the number of relations is equal to $ \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$ was addressed by Vershik. He conjectured that a generic algebra with this number of relations is finite dimensional. We prove that over any infinite field, the Anick conjecture holds for $d \geq \frac{4(n^2+n)}{9}$ and arbitrary number of generators $n$, and confirm the Vershik conjecture over any field of characteristic 0. We give also a series of related asymptotic results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.