Paper detail

The GIGANTES dataset: precision cosmology from voids in the machine learning era

We present GIGANTES, the most extensive and realistic void catalog suite ever released -- containing over 1 billion cosmic voids covering a volume larger than the observable Universe, more than 20 TB of data, and created by running the void finder VIDE on QUIJOTE's halo simulations. The expansive and detailed GIGANTES suite, spanning thousands of cosmological models, opens up the study of voids, answering compelling questions: Do voids carry unique cosmological information? How is this information correlated with galaxy information? Leveraging the large number of voids in the GIGANTES suite, our Fisher constraints demonstrate voids contain additional information, critically tightening constraints on cosmological parameters. We use traditional void summary statistics (void size function, void density profile) and the void auto-correlation function, which independently yields an error of $0.13\,\mathrm{eV}$ on $\sum\,m_ν$ for a 1 $h^{-3}\mathrm{Gpc}^3$ simulation, without CMB priors. Combining halos and voids we forecast an error of $0.09\,\mathrm{eV}$ from the same volume. Extrapolating to next generation multi-Gpc$^3$ surveys such as DESI, Euclid, SPHEREx, and the Roman Space Telescope, we expect voids should yield an independent determination of neutrino mass. Crucially, GIGANTES is the first void catalog suite expressly built for intensive machine learning exploration. We illustrate this by training a neural network to perform likelihood-free inference on the void size function. Cosmology problems provide an impetus to develop novel deep learning techniques, leveraging the symmetries embedded throughout the universe from physical laws, interpreting models, and accurately predicting errors. With GIGANTES, machine learning gains an impressive dataset, offering unique problems that will stimulate new techniques.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.