Paper detail

The GeV counterpart of VER J2019+407 in the northern shell of the supernova remnant G78.2+2.1 ($γ$ Cygni)

Analysis of gamma-ray emission from the supernova remnant G78.2+2.1 ($γ$ Cygni) with 7.2 years of cumulative data from the Fermi-LAT telescope shows a distinct hard, bright and extended component to the north of the shell coincident with the known TeV source VER J2019+407. In the GeV-TeV energy range its spectrum is best described by a broken power-law with indices 1.8 below a break energy of 71 GeV and 2.5 above the break. A broadband spectral energy distribution is assembled and different scenarios for the origin of the gamma-rays are explored. Both hadronic and leptonic mechanisms are able to account for the GeV-TeV observations. In the leptonic framework, a superposition of inverse Compton and nonthermal bremsstrahlung emissions is needed whereas the hadronic scenario requires a cosmic ray population described by a broken power-law distribution with a relatively hard spectral index of $\sim1.8$ below a break particle energy of 0.45 TeV. In addition, the neutrino flux expected from cosmic ray interactions is calculated.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.