Paper detail

The Geometry behind the Glass Transition and Frictional Jamming in Systems of Two-Dimensional Hard Disks

The relation between dynamics and structure in systems of Brownian bidisperse 2D hard disks with arrested dynamics is examined using numerical simulations. Surprisingly, the suspensions show dynamic arrest at an area fraction of ϕ {\approx} 0.777 over a wide range of disk-size ratios. This is in close agreement with the experimental findings of [Nat. Mater. 18, 1118 (2019)] (ϕ {\approx} 0.776) for a quasi-2D colloidal suspension of spheres with large-to-small size ratio of approximately 1.4. Intriguingly, this also matches a jamming transition (ϕ {\approx} 0.773 to 0.777) found experimentally in a 2D bidisperse granular packing of disks for a similar aspect ratio [Powders and Grains (2025)]. Adopting a geometric viewpoint allows for the identification of the floret pentagonal tiling (ϕ {\approx} 0.777343), which is comprised of congruent (elongated) pentagonal tiles. In analogy to foam and tissue models, it is the presence of this congruent reference state that induces a dynamical transition in the disordered fluid of the disks. That is, the change in dynamics observed both in a uniformly compressed granular medium and a colloidal one at finite temperature are implied to be caused by the same topological mechanism. Extending this reasoning to a honeycomb lattice could also explain the experimentally observed onset of caging dynamics (ϕ {\approx} 0.6) in a similar bidisperse, quasi-2D system of colloidal spheres [Nature 587, 225 (2020)]. An outlook is provided on how this concept may be applied to 3D: removing one in four particles from a face-centered-cubic arrangement leads to a square bipyramidal honeycomb} with associated volume fraction η {\approx} 0.55536. The ideas put forward here thus also provide a possible origin for random loose packing of (frictional) hard spheres in 3D and can potentially shed light onto the nature of the glass transition.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.