Paper detail

The geometric SMEFT

Effective field theories, like the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), are defined by a chosen field content and a set of symmetries, up to a cut off scale $Λ$. Usually, in order to perform calculations, gauge independent field re-definitions consistent with the symmetries of the theory are then used to redefine the fields. This procedure results in a fixed (non-redundant) operator basis, that is not itself field re-definition invariant. Recently, an alternative approach of identifying and calculating with field space geometry has been developed. Field redefinition invariants, characterising field space geometry, appear in observables in amplitude perturbations, and have an expansion in terms of local operators. In the case of the SMEFT, calculating via the geometric approach is known as the geoSMEFT. This approach makes it much easier to calculate at high orders in $1/Λ$ in the SMEFT, and can directly result in a complete characterisation of an amplitude perturbation in the $1/Λ$ expansion. Using the geoSMEFT, several consistent and complete $\mathcal{O}(1/Λ^4)$ results are now known. We define the geoSMEFT and demonstrate its use in some examples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.