Paper detail

The Geometric Origin of the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem: A Constructive Proof via Dimensional Syzygy

We demonstrate that the Cayley-Hamilton theorem is a derived consequence of a more fundamental dimensional constraint: the syzygy formed by the tensor product of two Levi-Civita symbols, which vanishes identically in m-dimensional space. By shifting perspective from the tensor A to the isotropic operators that induce A's invariants through contraction, we reveal that the Cayley-Hamilton identity emerges when this vanishing operator acts on the m-fold tensor product of A. The intrinsic tensorial form of the theorem--invariant coefficients multiplying tensor powers--is inherited from the contraction structure rather than imposed ad hoc. We provide explicit verification for two-dimensional space and a dimension-independent proof using Laplace expansion combined with Newton-Girard identities. This framework clarifies why the theorem's structure depends on ambient dimension and suggests extensions to higher-order tensors where classical characteristic polynomial methods fail.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.