Paper detail

The Geometric Magnitude and Albedo for the Globe of Saturn

Saturn's geometric magnitude and albedo were determined by Mallama et al. (2017, Icarus 282, 19-33). That analysis depended largely on photometric data obtained when the ring system interfered with observations of the globe. In this study the magnitude and albedo are re-evaluated based on spectrophotometry obtained during a ring-plane crossing (Karkoschka, 1998, Icarus, 133, 134-146). A better correction for the illumination phase angle of Saturn's globe is also derived and it is applied to the spectroscopy. The resulting values for most of the 12 Johnson-Cousins and Sloan wavelength bands agree reasonably well with those reported by Mallama et al. but some significant differences are noted. The revised albedo value for the Rc band reduces the discrepancy with that inferred from the work of Dyudina et al. (2005, ApJ 618, 973-986).

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.