Paper detail

The geometric genus and Seiberg-Witten invariant of Newton nondegenerate surface singularities

Given a normal surface singularity (X,0), its link, M is a closed differentiable three dimensional manifold which carries much analytic information. It is an interesting question to ask whether, under suitable analytic and topological conditions, the geometric genus (or other analytic invariants) can be recovered from the link. The Casson invariant conjecture predicts that p_g can be identified using the Casson invariant in the case when (X,0) is a complete intersection and M has trivial first homology with integral coefficients. The Seiberg-Witten invariant conjecture predicts that the geometric genus of a Gorenstein singularity, whose link has trivial first homology with rational coefficients, can be calculated as a normalized Seiberg-Witten invariant of the link. The first conjecture is still open, but counterexamples have been found for the second one. We prove here the Seiberg-Witten invariant conjecture for hypersurface singularities given by a function with Newton nondegenerate principal part. We provide a theory of computation sequences and of the way they bound the geometric genus. Newton nondegenerate singularities can be resolved explicitly by Oka's algorithm, and we exploit the combinatorial interplay between the resolution graph and the Newton diagram to show that in each step of the computation sequence we construct, the given bound is sharp. Our method recovers the geometric genus of (X,0) explicitly from the link, assuming that (X,0) is indeed Newton nondegenerate with a rational homology sphere link. Assuming some additional information about the Newton diagram, we recover part of the spectrum, as well as the Poincaré series associated with the Newton filtration. Finally, we show that the normalized Seiberg-Witten invariant associated with the canonical spin^c structure on the link coincides with our identification of the geometric genus.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.