Paper detail

The geodesic motion of S2 and G2 as a test of the fermionic dark matter nature of our galactic core

[Abridged] The S-stars motion around the Galactic center (Sgr A*) implies the existence of a compact source with a mass of about $4\times 10^6 M_\odot$, traditionally assumed to be a massive black hole (BH). Important for any model is the explanation of the multiyear, accurate astrometric data of S2 and the challenging G2: its post-pericenter velocity decelerates faster than expected from a Keplerian orbit around the putative BH. This has been reconciled in the literature by acting on G2 a drag force by an accretion flow. Alternatively, we show that the S2 and G2 motion is explained by the "core-halo" fermionic dark matter (DM) profile of the fully-relativistic Ruffini-Argüelles-Rueda (RAR) model. It has been already shown that for 48-345 keV fermions, it accurately fits the rotation curves of the Milky-Way halo. We here show that, for a fermion mass of 56 keV, it explains the time-dependent data of the position (orbit) and light-of-sight radial velocity (redshift function $z$) of S2 and G2, the latter without a drag force. We find the RAR model fits better the data: the mean of reduced chi-squares of the orbit and $z$ data are, for S2, $\langle\barχ^2\rangle_{\rm S2, RAR}\approx 3.1$ and $\langle\barχ^2\rangle_{\rm S2, BH}\approx 3.3$ while, for G2, $\langle\barχ^2\rangle_{\rm G2, RAR}\approx 20$ and $\langle\barχ^2\rangle_{\rm G2, BH}\approx 41$. For S2 the fits of the $z$ data are comparable, $\barχ^2_{z,\rm RAR}\approx 1.28$ and $\barχ^2_{z,\rm BH}\approx 1.04$, for G2 only the RAR model fits, $\barχ^2_{z,\rm RAR}\approx 1.0$ and $\barχ^2_{z,\rm BH}\approx 26$. In addition, the critical mass for the gravitational collapse of a degenerate 56 keV-fermion DM core into a BH is $\sim 10^8 M_\odot$, which may be the initial seed for the formation of the observed central supermassive BH in active galaxies, such as M87.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.