Paper detail

The general theory of species abundance distributions

A central issue in ecology today is that of the factors determining the relative abundance of species within a natural community. The proper application of the principles of statistical physics to the problem of species abundance distributions (SADs) has enabled us to identify the fundamental ecological principles responsible for the near universal features observed. These principles are (i) a limit on the number of individuals in an ecological guild and (ii) per capita birth and death rates. We thus unify the neutral theory of Hubbell [1], the master equation approach of Volkov et al [2, 3] and a recent attempt at deploying statistical mechanics to deal with this problem, the idiosyncratic [extreme niche] theory of Pueyo et al [4]; we have identified the true origin of the prior in [4]. We also find in our results clear indications that niches must be very flexible and that temporal fluctuations on all sorts of scales are of considerable importance in community structure.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.