Paper detail

The Gemini Deep Deep Survey. VII. The Redshift Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relation

We have investigated the mass-metallicity (M-Z) relation using galaxies at 0.4<z<1.0 from the Gemini Deep Deep Survey and Canada-France Redshift Survey. Deep K and z' band photometry allowed us to measure stellar masses for 69 galaxies. From a subsample of 56 galaxies, for which metallicity of the interstellar medium is also measured, we identified a strong correlation between mass and metallicity, for the first time in the distant Universe. This was possible because of the larger base line spanned by the sample in terms of metallicity (a factor of 7) and mass (a factor of 400) than in previous works. This correlation is much stronger and tighter than the luminosity-metallicity, confirming that stellar mass is a more meaningful physical parameter than luminosity. We find clear evidence for temporal evolution in the M-Z relation in the sense that at a given mass, a galaxy at z=0.7 tends to have lower metallicity than a local galaxy of similar mass. We use the z=0.1 SDSS M-Z relation, and a small sample of z=2.3 Lyman break galaxies with known mass and metallicity, to propose an empirical redshift-dependent M-Z relation, according to which the stellar mass and metallicity in small galaxies evolve for a longer time than in massive galaxies. This relation predicts that the generally metal poor damped Lyman-alpha galaxies have stellar masses of the order of 10^8.8 M_sun (with a dispersion of 0.7 dex) all the way from z=0.2 to z=4. The observed redshift evolution of the M-Z relation can be reproduced remarkably well by a simple closed-box model where the key assumption is an e-folding time for star formation which is higher or, in other words, a period of star formation that lasts longer in less massive galaxies than in more massive galaxies. Such a picture supports the downsizing scenario for galaxy formation.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.