Paper detail

The Gaseous Extent of Galaxies and The Origin of QSO Absorption Line Systems

We present results of an ongoing program to study the gaseous extent of galaxies and the origin of QSO absorption line systems. For \lya absorption systems, we find that absorption equivalent width depends strongly on galaxy impact parameter and galaxy $B$-band luminosity, and that the gaseous extent of individual galaxies scales with galaxy $B$-band luminosity as $r\propto L_B^{0.40\pm0.09}$. Applying the results to galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field to calculate the predicted number density of \lya absorption lines as a function of redshift and comparing it with observations, we find that at least 50% and perhaps as much as 100% of \lya absorption systems with $W\apg0.32$ Åcan be explained by the extended gaseous envelops of normal galaxies. The anti-correlation analysis has also been performed on \civ absorption line systems, and the results show that the ionized gas cross section scales with galaxy $B$-band luminosity as $r\propto L_B^{0.76\pm0.26}$.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.