Paper detail

The Gap Test: Effects of Crack Parallel Compression on Fracture in Carbon Fiber Composites

This paper explores the global Mode I fracture energy of a carbon fiber composite subject to a biaxial stress state at a crack tip, specifically in which one stress component is compressive and parallel to the crack. Based on an experimental technique previously coined as The Gap Test and Bazant's Type II Size Effect Law, it is found that there is a monotonic decrease in the Mode I fracture energy as the crack parallel compressive stress increases. Compared to the nominal value of fracture energy, where no crack parallel compression is applied, the fracture energy is observed to decrease by up to 37% for a compressive stress equal to 44% of the compressive failure limit of the composite. This weakening effect is attributed to splitting cracks that are induced at the crack tip due to the crack parallel compression, which are identified via crack tip photomicroscopy. This is a novel result that challenges the century old hypothesis of fracture energy being a constant material property and further, shows for the first time that crack parallel compression leads to a composite structure being dangerously weaker than expected. The experimental campaign is also buttressed with a computational campaign that provides a framework capable of capturing the effects of crack parallel compression. Through the use of the crack band model, which correctly characterizes the fracture process zone tensorially, coupled with a fully tensorial damage law, the simulated results provide satisfactory agreement with the experimental data. Conversely, when a reduced tensorial damage law defines the crack band it is shown that the structural strength and fracture energy are dangerously overpredicted. This emphasizes the importance of using a crack band model coupled with a fully tensorial damage law to accurately predict fracture in composites.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.